I wake up on days like today, and try as I may, I am reminded that my life has been totally changed...I'm getting better at not saying ruined, because I have my family and friends, but...the "what if" scenario runs through my mind again...
What if the US Army CID at Fort Myer had actually done an investigation? What if this supposedly "professional" corps of children with badges had done their job...actually conducted a real investigation of the utter bullshit allegations made by #1LTCH ?
Hopefully, you've also seen that if CID had done an investigation, then the twisted prosecutor would not have even known my name...See earlier post and the brave letter the primary witness writes in my case.
What if CID was trained in what seems to be "basic" criminal investigation techniques on How to "spot a LIE"?
What if?
I've done a cut and paste to the "list" Stacy Dittrich, a former Ohio police detective, crime expert and author describes in the article
Here are the most tell-tale signs, revealed.
A pre-emptive 911 call: Criminals (Liars) sometimes call police very early to cover their bases. For instance, a man with a missing spouse might call police within a couple hours to say something is wrong. "The first question the detective is asking is why they're assuming something is wrong because not getting ahold of someone right away is pretty normal," Dittrich said.
ASK any rational/normal person what was the first thing they did after finding out they were HIV+, and 99.9% of us are NOT calling CID or the police...
The emotions don't fit: even if what a suspect is saying on the call appears to be true, their tone is a big tip-off to police, Dittrich said. For instance, a calm demeanor while reporting a home invasion could indicate something is amiss because ``most people are hysterical in that kind of situation.''
Lets just say cold and soulless...if you were a "real" victim of something like this you would not be as cold and creepy as he was in the entire process...oh and you would not have gone to a sex party the night before you took the stand and testified against me, done crystal meth and not disclosed your own HIV status to anyone...yeah Navy E7 Rob Nelson came forward and told us what happened on 28 June 2012...
Not answering "yes" or "no": an innocent person will usually answer questions with a direct yes or no. Not so for criminals, says Dittrich. When asked "are you involved in this murder?" they are likely to give a long answer like "I swear on my mother's grave and all my children I didn't." This is a way of stalling: even though they tell themselves to lie, they can't quite follow through.
#1LTCH had was never able to answer yes or no...to any question...He is smarter than everyone else in his little mind...read the Article 32 and Record of Trial...
Too many details: A criminal usually carefully plans their story in advance, anticipating that they'll eventually speaks with detectives. A 911 call with too many details about the suspect, such as what they did that day or whether they're happy with their significant other, is a red flag because it shows the person put thought into his or her story.
#1LTCH couldn't even describe any sexual act or any means likely of an act that could have introduced my blood or semen to him, but holy shit he could remember my mother eating raw steak and that it grossed him out...its call steak tartar you asshole!
Lying about small stuff: Even the most innocuous statements can reveal inconsistencies, Dittrich said. A suspect talk of watching a television show in his or her alibi statement, but the show didn't air that night. Lies about small stuff usually culminate in bigger evidence against the accused.
#1LTCH admits to lying, stealing passwords, "hacking" into my email and websites, but that's no big deal right?
Referring to a missing person in past-tense: Most people hold out hope that their missing loved one will be found alive. Referring to a person in past tense, saying "I really loved her" or "he and I were happily married,'' is incriminating, Dittrich said.
#1LTCH describes another "victim" oh but that person had never met me...
Saying ``huh?'' : When police ask a direct question, such as "Did you steal those items?" a guilty suspect will often pretend not to hear in order to stall and come up with a story, Dittrich said. Instead of answering a very direct question they say "huh?" or "what do you mean?" Dittrich said.
"You can't remember or describe having sex with LTC Pinkela?" asks Phil Cave Defense Attorney...#1LTCH replies on the stand "I don't know what you mean..."
Helpfully offering another explanation: a suspect will often try and mislead detectives by putting another suspicious person on the investigation's radar, Dittrich said. If a person denies a kidnapping but mentions a creepy man in a van, it's important to see if there's any other evidence of such a person existing. If there's not, chances are the suspect made up a story to deflect the blame.
So #1LTCH admits to hacking into a website, under oath by the way at the Article 32 hearing, and HE then turns the altered "hacked" stuff over to the prosecution...( I shit you not...it's in the Record of Trial at the Article 32)
Most criminals destroy themselves with their own statements. The ones who are acquitted (or get away with their lies) despite ample evidence are "sociopathic'' enough to convince themselves that the lies are reality, Dittricht told us...
#1LTCH was HIV+ long before ever meeting me (remember I only met this sociopath (thanks to US Marine Captain Adam Potter) - 2 times in my life and it was NEVER alone) and oh yeah what about the "John Doe" Phil Cave was talking to in Atlanta that was accused earlier by our sociopath #1LTCH for infecting him? No pattern there, huh?
"It's haunting because the people who get away are the ones deranged enough to believe their own lies,'' Dittrich said.
